Skip to main content
Mandry Technology
Back to compliance

CIS Controls · Compliance

CIS Controls evidence that survives review.

18 prioritized safeguards. Implementation Groups. Continuous evidence.

Mandry Technology implements CIS Controls v8 through Cybersecurity and Managed IT for compliance-driven organizations in Texas and adjacent states. CIS provides a cross-industry security baseline distinct from Mandry's SOC 2 Type II attestation: 18 prioritized safeguards organized into Implementation Groups, with IG1 covering essential cyber hygiene for most mid-market buyers. Controls map to asset inventory, secure configuration, account management, vulnerability management, and logging under SOC 2 Type II operating discipline, producing evidence cyber insurance carriers, auditors, and assessors actually inspect.

What auditors expect

CIS Controls

Asset inventory, vulnerability remediation, access reviews, and IR evidence aligned to CIS v8 safeguards

Primary practices: Cybersecurity, Managed IT

Ready to discuss your compliance environment?

Request an assessment conversation. We respond during business hours with next steps tailored to your regulatory scope.

Request an assessment

Context

What CIS Controls v8 expect from your security program.

CIS Controls v8 organize 18 safeguards into Implementation Groups that scale from essential cyber hygiene to mature programs. Compliance buyers use them as a cross-industry posture benchmark alongside framework-specific obligations like HIPAA, FFIEC, and TX-RAMP.

  • Implementation Group scoping

    IG1 covers essential cyber hygiene for most mid-market organizations. IG2 and IG3 extend coverage for mature programs. Scoping without documentation does not survive audit or carrier review.

  • Enterprise asset inventory

    Documented hardware and software inventories aligned to CIS Safeguard 1.x. Unknown assets are the gap auditors and carriers find first.

  • Secure configuration and change control

    Hardened baselines, configuration management, and change records aligned to CIS Safeguard 4.x. Drift without documentation is a finding waiting to happen.

  • Account and access management

    Privileged access management, MFA deployment, and periodic access reviews aligned to CIS Safeguard 5.x and 6.x expectations.

  • Continuous vulnerability management

    Continuous vulnerability scanning, remediation tracking, and evidence binders aligned to CIS Safeguard 7.x for carrier and auditor review.

  • Logging, monitoring, and incident response

    24/7 SOC monitoring via Arctic Wolf, audit log retention, and documented IR runbooks aligned to CIS Safeguard 8.x and 17.x expectations.

Comparison

Generic regional MSP vs Mandry for CIS Controls.

The difference shows up when an audit, breach, or carrier renewal forces you to produce evidence, not when everything is running smoothly.

When it mattersGeneric regional MSPMandry
Ransomware response timelinesTicket closed at end of business; notification handled ad hocDocumented IR runbooks with HIPAA breach notification timelines and forensic coordination
Vendor and third-party oversightSpreadsheet updated annually before examination seasonDocumented vendor risk assessments, access reviews, and subprocessor inventories maintained continuously

Trust

The evidence underneath the claim.

SOC 2 Type II

Type II attestation

24/7 SOC

SOC monitoring (Arctic Wolf)

97%

client retention

20+

years of continuous operation

Finance team reviewing cyber insurance renewal documentation and security evidence bindersScenario

Scenario

What happens when a CFO is asked for CIS-aligned vulnerability and MFA evidence during a carrier renewal.

Cyber insurance carriers increasingly expect evidence of prioritized safeguards, not generic policy documents. The renewal questionnaire asks for vulnerability scan reports, MFA deployment records, and remediation tracking mapped to a recognized baseline. Mandry maintains continuous evidence aligned to CIS Controls v8 through the compliance documentation program: scan results, access review records, and SOC monitoring logs the carrier can actually inspect.

Memberships

HCISPP

Vendor Stack

Related Frameworks

Beyond CIS Controls.

Most compliance environments answer to more than one framework. Explore the related obligations Mandry maps to the same operating discipline.

FAQ

Questions about CIS Controls.

What are CIS Controls v8 and Implementation Groups?

CIS Controls v8 organizes 18 prioritized safeguards into Implementation Groups. IG1 covers essential cyber hygiene for most organizations. IG2 and IG3 extend coverage for mature programs. Mandry scopes implementation to the group's risk profile and maintains evidence continuously through the compliance documentation program.

How do CIS Controls relate to HIPAA, FFIEC, and other frameworks?

CIS Controls provide a cross-industry security baseline. Mandry maps controls once and evidences them across framework-specific obligations like HIPAA, FFIEC, and GLBA, reducing duplicate documentation work during audits and carrier renewals.

How does Mandry help with cyber insurance renewals using CIS evidence?

Mandry maintains continuous attestation evidence: vulnerability scan reports, MFA records, IR documentation, and SOC monitoring evidence mapped to CIS Controls v8 and carrier questionnaire expectations.

How do CIS Controls differ from SOC 2 Type II?

CIS Controls define a prioritized security baseline any organization can implement. SOC 2 Type II is an independent attestation that an MSP's controls operated effectively over time. Mandry maintains both: CIS-aligned safeguards for clients and SOC 2 Type II attestation as the operating discipline underneath.

Can Mandry support co-managed IT while implementing CIS Controls?

Yes. Co-managed IT extends internal teams rather than replacing them. Mandry can operate SOC monitoring, vulnerability management, and compliance documentation while internal staff retain control of core systems.

How does Mandry cover AI-era threats within a CIS-aligned program?

Mandry extends CIS-aligned monitoring and governance to AI-era threats: voice-cloning protocols, generative phishing detection, and AI tool governance documentation.

Choosing a managed IT services company is itself a compliance-visible decision.

The right time to evaluate one is before the audit, before the breach, before the regulator's letter arrives.

What brings you here?

CallRequest an assessment